第二是思考SOP的目的，这里也说了目的是有两个，对于我们申请者来说，SOP的目的是要让对方学校给自己offer；从adcom的角度看，SOP是要告诉他们how you would fit into their program.
我觉得这两个目的是人都知道吧，哈哈，还好作者细说了到底啥叫fit。我觉得这里引出的几个问题每个申请者都应该细细思考一番。
Does the program have faculty in your area of research interest? Do they have something to offer you?
Do you have the necessary knowledge, skills, abilities? What you can offer them?
What is it about you that makes you a better prospect than everyone else who*s applying?
我个人认为是要把这些问题想清楚了之后动手写SOP就自然行云流水了。

这里插入一个我个人的惨痛经验吧。我两年前就是太懒了，都没做好功课就申请了学校。去读了那个唯一要我的学校。去了才知道我们专业要完成400小时的实习要求！没完成的毕不了业！当时我就吓傻了。
这些要求都是明文写在学校网址上的。我根本就没有细看。还好运气不错。有贵人帮助找到个实习，完成了400小时。不然后果不堪设想啊！
所以希望大家一定要做好research功课！不仅仅是对写SOP有用，也对自己的择校很有帮助的！

“Research is one of the basic keys to writing an SOP. It*s no different than the writing sample you*ll be including in your application packet. For each program you apply to, do some research. How much research you need to do depends on a lot of things, the least of which is your personality. More research does not automatically mean a better SOP. Less research doesn*t automatically mean a better one, either. What makes the right amount of research? The ability to craft an SOP that is specific for the program that you*re getting into. Here*s some ideas (not an exhaustive, inclusive list of what to do) on what to research:
The program itself. Look at the recent graduates and, if possible, read their theses and/or dissertations, at least in part. The acknowledgements can give you an idea about the program*s culture. The introduction can give you an idea about what kind of scholarship the program produces and expects. It will also, and this is very important, give you an idea as to how the program uses language. If you speak to them in their own language, that helps your case. You*ve likely done this, if not, seriously, you should have done this. Look at the program*s website and read it all. What kind of classes are offered for both undergrad and grad. Who are the faculty, the tenured, the assistant, the visiting, the emeritus, and the graduate students. What kind of ties to the community (both academic and their local town) do they like to talk about? Do they talk about how their graduate students are working with community partners? Do they host conferences? What happened at the last one? This gives you a taste of the program*s culture.

The faculty. All of them that might be on the adcomm and the ones that are relevant or somewhat relevant to your interests. Crack open JSTOR etc. and search for recent faculty publications. If you*re basing your interest on a faculty member on the interests they*ve got listed on the site and a reference to them in an article from a decade ago, or worse, only their reputation, you don*t have a strong basis to establish clear reasons why they have anything to offer you. Read their recent publications, see who they name drop in terms of theory, other faculty, and so on. Make a list of what each faculty member can offer you in terms of research, not just the ones that are directly related to it. If you*re into studying apples, but Dr. V works with oranges, think about how Dr. V*s work might help you out. Take notes when you research. Each program has a bunch of people, and you*re likely applying to multiple programs. It*s easier to refer to notes than to go back and look it up all over again.
What*s happening in the field with your current research interests, if necessary. This is so you can situate your research interests in the discipline, and then situation your research interests in the program. You can just tell them what you*re research interests are and leave the situating to them, but you can lose that chance to sell yourself as the best amongst the rest.

Research you. Yup. You. Scribble out some lists or paragraphs or whatever that inventories you. Who are your influences? Who are the theorists you keep coming back to? Who are the theorists you loathe, mock, and/or ridicule? What are your research interests in general and specifically and anywhere in between? Some SOPs will need to be more general, some will need to be more specific. Length restrictions, what you found out about the program, the faculty, the state of the discipline, and so on, can alter this for you. What kind of scholar are you? Student? What*s the difference? How do you manage your time? Stress? Health? Do you expect to bring your dog? Do you have health issues? Do you have any academic things that are a negative? If you do, how negative are they? It*s easy to see that as an either it*s entirely bad, or it*s somewhere in the huge good category, but some things are negatives that need to be addressed for certain programs, while other negatives can be ignored, or you should discuss with the one relevant letter writer so they can address it. While Sam ultimately received a C in the Research Methods course, the grade doesn*t reflect the actual scholarship as Sam fell ill during the mid-term and consequently failed it; my course policies do not permit re-taking the test. What are the good things about you? Not just the grades, awards, publications, and presentations, but also the character traits. What are you weaknesses? Don*t do the job interview baloney, my greatest weakness is my perfectionism. Of course, the important, probably ought to be on the SOP questions: why grad school? What will you do with the degree you want? Why are into the research you*re into? Why that particular school? Why are you worth admission and funding?

Research the assistanceships. Some SOPs will want you to write a bit about teaching or research with assistanceships in mind. So, do a bit of research on what these entail in the programs you*re looking at. What do they do and how do they get it? Have you done assistanceships in the past? If so, what were they like? Do you have a teaching philosophy? If not, make one. Have you done anything that can be discussed in terms of the assistanceship? I taught kung-fu to white belt children, so I have teaching experience. I was part of the state herpetological society and went out to help them with their field counts twice a year. I learned that licking petrie dishes is always a bad idea, no matter how much they resemble pistachio ice cream.
Research SOPs. You*re doing that, right? Go on to forums (like this one) and read the SOPs people have posted and then read the responses. Look particularly at SOPs in your discipline or related disciplines. Psychology might look at other social sciences. Physics might tell the joke about the Higgs Boson and Sunday mass. Bear in mind that the people responding to and/or criticizing the posted SOPs are likely not on an adcomm. Some have been or will be, but it*s not likely they*ll be on the adcomm you*re hoping will like you best. However, you can start to get a sense of what SOPs are like. What format is it in? Does yours look like everyone else*s? Do you have the exact same opening sentence as half of the people hoping to get into a program in your discipline? I*ve always wanted to be a librarian since those wonderful, summer days I spent in my (relative of choice)*s home library. ”

我个人是认为这一大段对自己的启发是最最最最大的！大家一定要看这几段关于research的！
我两年前当然也知道要给每个学校做research啦，但是，懒呀，烦呀。因为这种功课是最耗时间了，跟无底洞样的。作者在这里就很贴心地为大家指明了research的方向，请各位看官自己去看。
“So, to take stock. First, understand the purpose. Second, research. A lot. Let the purpose of the SOP guide your research efforts.”
“Next, get the specific requirements for the SOP from each program. Make a list of similarities. If they all ask for a statement of your research interest, score! One sentence fits most! Most of them will be of different lengths and will have different ideas of what specific information they want. Most won*t tell you enough, aside from length and one or two "should have" things. They mostly won*t tell you if you should use APA or if you should footnote, or how to format it. Single space? Double space? They will tell you whether it should be on paper or what kind of file format to use. I have only one suggestion: consistency. Okay, two suggestions: unless otherwise specified, don*t include anything other than the SOP. No bibliography or footnotes. If you quote or paraphrase someone, cite them in the text the way they do it in the average newspaper article. As Scooby says, "Ruh-roh!"”

第四，不同学校对SOP的要求可能不太一样，所以要求看各自不一样的要求，有的学校可能会想知道你未来五年的计划，那你就别说太多你童年的故事啥啥的。
作者是建议make a list of similarities，这样比较省时一点。
“Now, start writing. Create something of a master SOP, or a set of master sentences for the SOPs. Some things should be in every one of them, like what your research interests are. Because length requirements are different for each program, you should work out more than one sentence or set of sentences for each thing you plan to put into more than one SOP. Have a more detailed explanation of your research interests and a more concise one. Even though this might be central and, perhaps, most important to the SOP, you don*t want most of a short SOP taken up by one thing. Make these sentences do extra duties. If they can explain not only why you*re into what you*re into, but also why it*s significant to the discipline/program, and how the program factors into it, bonus! The more functions one sentence can serve, with clear, readable logic, the more room you have in the length requirements to bring in other things. Think of this master SOP as more of a set of sentences you can hang on the individual SOP*s unique structure. A flesh and skeleton metaphor can work here. You can order all SOPs at this point, you*ll probably want to put research interests in the middle or toward the end, rather than in the first sentence, but the key here is that the skeleton of the individual SOP and most of its flesh will come from the needs of the program you*re writing it for, not from some predetermined formula. No generically applicable, master SOP that has a few tweaks here and there.”

第五，写起来！搞个master SOP！我个人认为这个建议不错，这个也是我现在正在做的事。
“Here*s the thing. The SOP is one of the most important documents you*ll write in your life. It*s not something that should be done in a few hours, after looking at the program website and spending some time on the net searching for a how-to-write-an-SOP-guide. It takes work backed by research. The readers can tell quite easily how much research you*ve done on them by the way you structure and write your SOP. They can tell if you*re sending out a generic SOP to several programs because it will be too general. You can*t change faculty names in and out, along with a detail or two that makes it seem tailored to the program. The individual SOP should be tailored from the beginning. Some sentences won*t change much, so you can pre-write them. But how they fit into each SOP, the reasoning you*ll use to try to convince the adcomm that you*re the best applicant, and the perspective you*ll take all the way to the words you use should be done with the program in mind. It shouldn*t be generic. Even if it doesn*t seem noticeably generic to you, that doesn*t mean that the adcomm won*t notice it. They read many, many SOPs every year. People who read SOPs develop a sense about the generic, the cut and paste work.
How to name drop gracefully, or bring up the theory and histories and whatnot you*re working with when there*s only a teeny amount of space for everything? That*s a bit easier than it might seem. It*s not in the explanation; it*s in the usage. If you can use the relevant theories and people and methodologies correctly in a sentence, you don*t have to show the adcomm that you know how to use them, or how they*re related, by explaining it. Trust them to have enough education to make a few connections for themselves when it comes to the discipline. Example: Novels such as Twilight exemplify how Marxist alienation can be applied to childbirth. My research interest lies in the alienation of women from the product of delivery in Modernist American fiction, such as Faulkner*s Sound and the Fury. (Huh, I wonder if that would really work?) Two sentences and I*ve referenced theory, period, history, relevance for today, and some methodology (it*s literature, not science). Use it, don*t explain it.
If possible, have a professor you know read the SOP to your preferred school and give you some advice. They know more than most other groups of people. If not possible, your current university*s writing center can help, or other people who are familiar with the field, or with writing. Your high school English teacher or your English major buddy can probably say something about your grammar, but might not be as helpful as expected. Example, in English, the convention is to speak of historical people in present tense. Shakespeare writes, "To be or not to be," because he thinks it is the question. History has kittens. Shakespeare has been dead for centuries, he can*t write! Past tense! Shakespeare wrote, "To be or not to be," because thought it was the question. Someone in the field is preferable!”
我同意，最好是要找个教授看看自己的SOP，给自己点建议。
“Finally, a word about my real credentials. The adcomm is going to do to your application what you*ve just done with this post. They are going to judge your credentials (your ethos, trustworthiness, veracity, credibility, knowledge, and so on) based on the impressions they get of you from what you*ve written. So, be knowledgeable about you, your field, and the program, and use that knowledge well.”